It is important for healthcare providers to understand that medical malpractice is not the only form of medical mistreatment that may lead to legal action. Despite sounding similar, medical battery has distinct differences from medical malpractice that should be noted.
Medical malpractice results when a medical care provider neglects to offer appropriate medical treatment to a patient, provides substandard treatment which leads to the patient’s injury or death, or fails to take appropriate action.
To have a viable medical malpractice case, it is not enough to show that a patient did not get the results they wanted. Instead, a patient would need to prove that:
Medical battery occurs when a person inflicts physical harm on another person in a medical setting. While it may seem similar to medical negligence, the main difference between medical battery and medical negligence is intention. This is because medical battery generally results when a healthcare professional touches a patient without their permission.
To establish medical battery, the patient needs to prove the following:
Informed consent refers to the communication between a patient and their medical care provider that leads to an agreement or permission for treatment, care, or services. Informed consent can be provided orally or in writing. However, in a medical setting, consent is usually provided through a waiver signed by the patient before receiving some type of treatment.
Informed consent is not only critical for the patient but also for the healthcare professional, as it can protect them from being held liable for medical malpractice and medical battery.
At the law firm of Goodman Allen Donnelly, our legal team counsels various healthcare providers, including laboratories, hospitals, healthcare systems, and individual practitioners, regarding the legal risks and regulatory requirements they may face daily in their practice.
If you want to know more about the differences between medical malpractice and medical battery or understand your legal options if a patient is bringing a claim against you, contact Goodman Allen Donnelly today and find out how our attorneys can help you.
Legislation called the “Certified Help Options in Claim Expertise for Veterans Act of 2025” or…
In a move aimed at streamlining oversight and reducing administrative burdens on licensed behavioral health…
Goodman Allen Donnelly attorneys Peter Mellette and Robert Harrison Gibbs, Jr. have earned recognition as Pro Bono Service Honor…
The Virginia Department of Health State Health Services Plan Task Force’s Diagnostic Imaging Facilities and…
Goodman Allen Donnelly recently added Courtney Bachman as an associate with the firm’s Veterans Benefits Group. Courtney helps…
Goodman Allen Donnelly recently added veterans benefits litigator Patrick Cazalet as an associate with the firm’s Veterans Benefits…